RESEARCH POINTS
- Sex education led to postponed sexual intercourse for both males and females
- more likely to use birth control or contraception during first experience
- formal sex education may effectively reduce adolescent sexual risk behaviours when provided before sexual initiation
This research shows that sexual education actually postpones the adolescent’s decision to have sex for the first time. Also, it shows that adolescents who receive sexual education before their first sexual experience are more likely to take precautions that will reduce unexpected pregnancy and the occurrence of Sexually Transmitted Infections.
RESEARCH POINTS
- Abstinence-only education did not reduce the likelihood of engaging in vaginal intercourse while comprehensive sexual education did reduce the likelihood of engaging in the same sexual act
- Abstinence-only messages teach that sex should be delayed until marriage, and discussion of contraceptives typically limited to statements about ineffectiveness
- Unfortunately, to get federal funding for a sexual education program it must be abstinence based
- people who had a comprehensive sexual education program (versus an abstinence-only program or no sexual education at all) were significantly less likely to have teenage pregnancy
This study shows that, compared to no education or an abstinence-only education, that comprehensive led to teenagers who were less likely to have intercourse, get an STI or have an unexpected pregnancy. Abstinence-only programs just make the students more unwilling to use contraception when they do have sex because they are not fully educated on the matter. This supports my hypothesis of having a more explicit (comprehensive) sexual education program in schools because it benefits the students more.
RESEARCH POINTS
- Comprehensive sex education has been identified as highly effective and affect multiple behaviours and/or achieve positive health impacts
- Comprehensive programs delay the initiation of sex as well as reduce the frequency of sex, number of partners, and the incidence of unprotected sex and/or increasing the use of condoms and contraception among sexually active partners
- On the other hand, 88% of people who have an abstinence-only sexual education initiate in sex prior to marriage anyways even if it is delayed for a small amount of time. The same people were also less likely to seek STI testing which would prevent the spreading of diseases and are less likely to use contraception when they did have sex
- Also, 80% of the curricula for abstinence-only programs contain false, misleading or distorted information about reproductive health. This tends to include: false information about the effectiveness of contraceptives, false information about the risks of abortion, religious beliefs as scientific fact, stereotypes about boys and girls as scientific fact and medical and scientific errors as fact.
This study not only showed the benefits of having comprehensive sexual education as making youth and young adults wait longer before having sex, having sex less often and with less people, and having less unprotected sex, but it also showed the disadvantages of having an abstinence-only program that focuses only on not having sex before marriage. It brought to light how people who have this type of education do not have long-term benefits and also the false information that is commonly provided in this type of program which happens even in Sacred Heart.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- Providing youth with sexual health education, including information on contraception and condom use does not lead youth to become sexually active at an earlier age or to engage in more frequent sexual activity.
- it has been consistently found that providing contraceptive/safe sex does not lead to earlier or more frequent sexual activity
- especially programs that include discussion of condoms and contraceptive does not hasten the onset of intercourse, does not increase the frequency of sex and does not increase the number of sexual partners that that person will be with
This confirms once again that comprehensive sexual education that includes topics of condoms and contraception does not make youth want to have sex sooner or have sex more often, quite the opposite. It also decreases the amount of sexual partners that one person has.
5) Kirby, Douglas. "Impacts of Sex and HIV Education Programs on Sexual Behaviors of Youth in Developing and Developed Countries." International Board Of Education. Family Health International, 2005. Web. 20 Nov. 2011. <http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/HIV_and_AIDS/publications/DougKirby.pdf>.
RESEARCH POINTS
- Programs that have abstinence taught as well as condoms or contraception had a 93% effectiveness compared to just abstinence which only had 7%. It also concluded that the age 14.0 years to 17.9 years are the best years to get a sexual education compared to other ages.
- In all the studies, it found that programs which included both abstinence and condom/contraception lessons significantly delayed the initiation of sex for at least six months. The program however did not have an effect on the frequency of sex and did not increase the number of sexual partners and some even did decrease this number.
- Almost half of the programs found a significant increase in the amount of participants using condoms. They also found that teaching about condoms is equally effective in a school and community setting. There was also an increased use of contraception.
- A significant number of the programs found that the amount of sexual risk-taking and none found any increase. It also found positive changes in the area of STI and pregnancy rates.
This research paper will probably be the most useful to me of all the studies I found because it is the one the most in depth (it is 56 pages long). It shows that a comprehensive (including both abstinence and condoms/contraception) is significantly better than just an abstinence only program. It also shows that the best age to be teaching people about sexual education when you use these methods is 14.0 to 17.9 which is exactly the age that you are in high school, so the sex ed we get in high school matters the most. The comprehensive program had a positive effect on initiation of sex, number of sexual partners, and number of participants using condoms and contraception, and much less sexual risk-taking behaviors.